Ƙungiyar haɗin gwiwar CCS ta hanyar caji ta NACS Tesla

ƙungiyar da ke da alhakin tsarin caji na CCS EV, ta fitar da martani ga haɗin gwiwar Tesla da Ford kan tsarin caji na NACS.

Ba su ji daɗin hakan ba, amma ga abin da suka yi kuskure.

A watan da ya gabata, Ford ta sanar da cewa za ta haɗa NACS, mahaɗin caji na Tesla wanda ta buɗe a bara a ƙoƙarin ta na sanya shi matsayin cajin lantarki na Arewacin Amurka, cikin motocin lantarki na gaba.

Wannan babbar nasara ce ga NACS.

An san mahaɗin Tesla da kyau fiye da CCS.

NACS ta riga ta fi CCS shahara a Arewacin Amurka saboda yawan motocin lantarki da kamfanin kera motoci ya kawo a kasuwa, amma banda ƙirarta mafi inganci, ita ce kawai abin da ke damun mai haɗa motar.

Duk sauran kamfanonin kera motoci sun rungumi CCS.

Shigar da Ford cikin wannan jirgi babban nasara ne, kuma yana iya haifar da tasirin domino tare da ƙarin masu kera motoci waɗanda suka rungumi ƙa'idar don ƙirƙirar ƙirar haɗin haɗi mafi kyau da kuma sauƙin shiga hanyar sadarwa ta Supercharger ta Tesla.

Da alama CharIn na ƙoƙarin ƙarfafa memba nata da kada ta shiga NACS yayin da ta bayar da martani ga haɗin gwiwar Ford da Tesla tana ƙoƙarin tunatar da kowa cewa ita ce kawai "ma'aunin duniya":

Dangane da sanarwar da Kamfanin Ford Motor ya bayar a ranar 25 ga Mayu na amfani da Tsarin Cajin Kayayyaki na Arewacin Amurka (NACS) a cikin samfuran Ford EV na 2025, Shirin Cajin Interface (CharIN) da membobinsa sun ci gaba da jajircewa wajen samar wa direbobin EV ƙwarewar caji mai kyau da aiki tare ta amfani da Tsarin Cajin Kaya Mai Haɗaka (CCS).

Kungiyar ta yi ikirarin cewa matakin da ake fafatawa yana haifar da rashin tabbas:

Masana'antar EV ta duniya ba za ta iya bunƙasa tare da tsarin caji mai gasa da dama ba. CharIN tana goyon bayan ƙa'idodin duniya kuma tana bayyana buƙatun bisa ga ra'ayoyin membobinta na ƙasashen duniya. CCS ita ce ma'aunin duniya don haka tana mai da hankali kan haɗin gwiwa na ƙasashen duniya kuma, ba kamar NACS ba, an tabbatar da ita a nan gaba don tallafawa wasu shari'o'in amfani da yawa fiye da cajin gaggawa na jama'a na DC. Sanarwa da wuri, ba tare da haɗakar canje-canje ba na farko yana haifar da rashin tabbas a cikin masana'antar kuma yana haifar da cikas ga saka hannun jari.

CharIN ta yi jayayya cewa NACS ba ainihin mizani ba ne.

A cikin wani sharhi mai ban mamaki, ƙungiyar ta nuna rashin amincewarta da adaftar caji saboda suna da wahalar "riƙewa":

Bugu da ƙari, CharIN kuma ba ta goyon bayan haɓakawa da cancantar adaftar ba saboda dalilai da yawa, gami da mummunan tasirin da ke tattare da sarrafa kayan caji da kuma ƙwarewar mai amfani, ƙaruwar yuwuwar kurakurai, da tasirinsa akan amincin aiki.

Gaskiyar cewa haɗin caji na CCS yana da girma sosai kuma yana da wahalar sarrafawa shine ɗayan manyan dalilan da yasa mutane ke matsa lamba don ɗaukar NACS.

CharIn kuma ba ta ɓoye gaskiyar cewa tana ganin cewa tallafin gwamnati ga tashoshin caji ya kamata ya je ga waɗanda ke da haɗin CCS kawai ba:

Dole ne tallafin gwamnati ya ci gaba da tafiya zuwa ga ƙa'idodi na buɗewa, wanda koyaushe ya fi kyau ga mabukaci. Tallafin kayayyakin more rayuwa na jama'a, kamar Shirin Kayayyakin Motocin Lantarki na Ƙasa (NEVI), ya kamata a ci gaba da amincewa da shi kawai ga na'urorin caji masu ƙarfin CCS bisa ga jagorar ƙa'idodin tarayya mafi ƙaranci.

Ina kuma jin haushi idan na yi iƙirarin cewa ni "ma'auni ne na duniya." Da farko, me game da China? Haka kuma, shin da gaske ne duniya baki ɗaya idan masu haɗin CCS ba iri ɗaya ba ne a Turai da Arewacin Amurka?

Tsarin yarjejeniyar iri ɗaya ne, amma fahimtata ita ce tsarin NACS shi ma ya dace da CCS.

Gaskiyar magana ita ce CCS ta sami damar zama misali a Arewacin Amurka, amma masu gudanar da hanyoyin sadarwa na caji a yankin sun gaza ci gaba da bin tsarin sadarwa na Tesla na Supercharger dangane da girma, sauƙin amfani, da kuma aminci.

Yana ba wa Tesla wasu damar yin ƙoƙarin sanya NACS ta zama misali, kuma saboda kyawawan dalilai tunda ƙira ce mafi kyau. Ya kamata CCS da NACS su haɗu kawai a Arewacin Amurka kuma CCS za ta iya ɗaukar yanayin Tesla.